Hybride Bedrohungen im Age of Transparency und der Bedarf an einem digitalen Lagebild



- 6 days ago
- 12 min
The Implications of Drone Proliferation in the Geopolitics of the Middle East

- Mar 16
- 23 min
The Rohingya Crisis in Myanmar: Analysing the Use of Citizenship Status as Lawfare

- Mar 13
- 10 min
The “New Militancy” in Jammu and Kashmir: Contextualising the Emergent Trends

- Mar 9
- 12 min
State Your Case: The European Union Needs to Embrace Realism Before It's Too Late


- Mar 6
- 8 min
Vom Deutschen Zollverein zum Europa der Bürger

- Mar 2
- 20 min
The Movement For the Liberation Of Azawad

- Feb 27
- 17 min
A Reflection on the Political and Socio-Economic Stagnation in Tunisia


- Feb 20
- 3 min
The Atlantic and Its Enemies


- Feb 19
- 3 min
The Future of War, A History

- Feb 16
- 12 min
Iraq’s Role In The New U.S./Israel – Iran Confrontation In The Middle East


- Feb 13
- 9 min
Operational Planning Process And The New Domains


- Feb 9
- 25 min
China’s Anti-Access/Area-Denial Strategy


- Feb 6
- 6 min
Integrating Japan Into Regional Architecture Through Security Collaboration With Singapore


- Feb 2
- 18 min
The Commander of Tomorrow


Cognitive Science of Communal Taboo-Breaking Behaviour


- Jan 28
- 3 min
Marie von Clausewitz


- Jan 26
- 9 min
The Implications of Race in Contemporary 'Securitization of Migration'


- Jan 23
- 13 min
Re-Emergence of Khalistan: The Role of the Diaspora and Social Media


- Jan 19
- 18 min
The European Union’s Failed Acceptance of Serbia’s Eastern Reckoning

Looking for the latest issue of our Special Edition?
#Stand With Ukraine
Since the renewed beginning of the Russian military invasion of Ukraine a year ago, experts and politicians have been talking about a paradigm shift, which in Europe, by the otherwise so hesitant German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, was given the name "turning point" (“Zeitenwende”) just a few days after the outbreak of war.
The issue #Stand With Ukraine is an invitation to rethink the current approaches with an open mind and, inversely, the freedom to contribute extraordinary impulses to the debate.